Learn which graph answers which question, then connect the plotted measurement to a defensible practical method.
Read the axes before deciding the order
A concentration–time graph follows a single reaction mixture. Its gradient measures the rate at that moment; it is not itself a plot of rate against concentration. For a zero-order reactant, concentration falls linearly while the zero-order conditions hold. For a first-order reactant, the curve becomes less steep as concentration falls.
A rate–concentration graph compares measured rates at different concentrations with other relevant variables fixed. A horizontal line indicates zero order, a straight line through the origin first order and an upward quadratic curve second order. On a first-order rate–concentration graph the gradient is k because rate = k[A]. Do not apply that statement to a concentration–time graph.
Swipe horizontally to view the whole diagram.
Worked example: instantaneous rate is a tangent
Suppose a tangent at t = 40 s on an illustrative concentration–time curve passes through (20 s, 0.084 mol dm⁻³) and (70 s, 0.044 mol dm⁻³). Use those two well-separated points on the tangent, even though they need not both lie on the experimental curve.
Gradient = (0.044 − 0.084)/(70 − 20) = −8.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹. The disappearance rate is 8.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹. Drawing a line from the origin to the curve instead would generally give a mean over an interval, not the instantaneous rate at 40 s.
Why constant half-life identifies first order
Half-life is the time needed for a reactant concentration to fall to half its starting value for the interval considered. On a first-order curve, moving from 0.080 to 0.040, then 0.040 to 0.020 mol dm⁻³ takes equal time. The amount lost becomes smaller because the rate itself falls with concentration.
For an illustrative half-life of 120 s, k = ln 2/120 = 5.78 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹. After three half-lives, 1/8 of the initial concentration remains. A constant amount disappearing each minute instead suggests zero-order behaviour. OCR requires use of k = ln 2/t½, not derivation of an integrated rate law.
Continuous monitoring: choose a signal linked to concentration
A colorimeter can follow disappearance of a coloured reactant or formation of a coloured product. Choose a suitable filter or wavelength, zero with a solvent blank and use known standards to establish the relationship between absorbance and concentration. Keep the same clean cuvette orientation, path length and temperature; fingerprints and bubbles can alter light transmission.
Start timing at mixing and record readings at regular short intervals. Convert absorbance through the calibration relationship before plotting concentration against time unless proportionality has been established. A delay before the first reading can miss the steep initial region and underestimate an initial rate obtained from the recorded curve.
Alternative methods include gas volume or mass loss where the measured change can be related to the reacting amount. Apparatus must retain gas for a volume measurement, whereas a mass-loss setup deliberately lets the gas leave. Explain the link between the measured quantity and concentration; not every reaction has a useful colour or gas change. This develops PAG9/10 skills.
Initial-rate comparisons and clock reactions
Run separate mixtures with one concentration changed, constant total volume, fixed temperature and unchanged concentrations of other reactants. Replace omitted reagent volume with solvent where appropriate. Use c₁V₁/Vtotal to calculate the concentration after mixing; stock concentration is not automatically the reaction concentration.
A clock records the time to a fixed small extent of reaction, such as a colour endpoint produced after a fixed amount of scavenger is consumed. If the same small amount is required in every run, 1/t is proportional to the initial rate. It has units s⁻¹ and is not an absolute concentration rate unless multiplied by the fixed concentration change.
Repeat timings, use a consistent endpoint and keep the threshold small enough that reactant concentrations change little. A long clock time that consumes a substantial fraction of a reactant weakens the initial-rate approximation. Control temperature with a water bath and let solutions equilibrate before mixing, rather than merely recording room temperature.
Quick checks
Original Finesse questions. Reveal the indicative worked solutions after attempting each question; these are not official OCR A mark allocations.
Q1. A concentration falls from 0.100 to 0.050 in 80 s and to 0.025 in another 80 s. Find the order and k.Show answer
Equal successive half-lives support first order under these conditions. k = 0.693147/80 = 8.66 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹.
Q2. A first-order rate–concentration line passes through (0.0200, 1.00 × 10⁻⁴) and the origin. Find k.Show answer
Gradient = 1.00 × 10⁻⁴/0.0200 = 5.00 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹. The units come from rate divided by concentration; this graph is not concentration versus time.
Q3. A clock endpoint occurs at 48 s then 24 s in otherwise comparable mixtures. What rate comparison is justified?Show answer
The second approximate initial rate is twice the first because (1/24)/(1/48) = 2. This assumes an identical small endpoint amount and little concentration change before it.
Q4. 10.0 cm³ of 0.300 mol dm⁻³ A is mixed to a total of 50.0 cm³. What initial [A] goes in the rate table?Show answer
[A] = 0.300 × 10.0/50.0 = 0.0600 mol dm⁻³. Moles of A remain the same on dilution but occupy five times the volume.
Q5. A student uses two points on the curve either side of 40 s to claim an exact instantaneous rate. Improve the method.Show answer
That secant gives an average rate across the interval. Draw a tangent at 40 s and calculate its gradient from a large triangle on the tangent. State the uncertainty associated with drawing and reading the graph.
Sources
Sources and examiner guidance (reviewed 6 October 2026)
- OCR A H432 specification — version 3.1 — 5.1.1, printed pp. 42–43; outcomes and additional guidance, with relevant Module 1 practical skills.
- Chemrevise — OCR A 5.1.1 — Pages 1–7; secondary coverage cross-check. Lesson explanations, data and questions are original Finesse material.
- OCR H432/01 mark scheme — June 2025 — Q18(b–c); printed pp. 20–21. Question-specific evidence, not universal marking rules.
- OCR H432/01 examiner report — June 2025 — Q18(b–c); printed pp. 35–38. Read with the corresponding question context.
- OCR H432/01 question paper — June 2025 — Q18(b–c); context for the assessment references, not reproduced questions.
Finesse Tuition is not endorsed by AQA or Chemrevise. All explanations and examples here are our own.
