Use the limiting reactant to establish the theoretical yield, then judge both the experimental recovery and the waste designed into a process.
Follow the balanced equation
Convert the known mass, gas volume or solution quantity to moles. Use the equation’s coefficient ratio to find the required substance’s moles. Finally convert to the requested quantity. Label the substance at each step.
Worked example: 4.20 g NaHCO₃ (M = 84.0) decomposes by 2NaHCO₃ → Na₂CO₃ + CO₂ + H₂O. n(NaHCO₃) = 0.0500 mol, so n(CO₂) = 0.0250 mol and mass CO₂ = 0.0250 × 44.0 = 1.10 g.
A reactant can remain when the reaction stops
Compare available moles divided by the coefficient for each reactant. The smallest value identifies the limiting reactant. Do not compare masses directly.
For 2Mg + O₂ → 2MgO, 0.100 mol Mg and 0.0400 mol O₂ have n/coefficient values 0.0500 and 0.0400. O₂ limits: it uses 0.0800 mol Mg and makes 0.0800 mol MgO. Magnesium left = 0.0200 mol. If M(MgO) = 40.3, theoretical product mass = 3.224 g.
Worked limiting reagent from two measured masses
For 2Al + 3Cl₂ → 2AlCl₃, take 2.70 g Al and 7.10 g Cl₂, with M values 27.0, 71.0 and 133.5 g mol⁻¹. Available amounts are 0.100 mol Al and 0.100 mol Cl₂. Equal amounts do not mean exact reacting proportions: the equation needs more chlorine than aluminium.
Divide each amount by its coefficient: Al gives 0.100/2 = 0.0500; Cl₂ gives 0.100/3 = 0.033333…. Chlorine limits. Product amount = 2 × 0.033333… = 0.066666… mol, giving theoretical product mass 8.90 g. Aluminium consumed = 0.066666… mol, so 0.033333… mol or 0.900 g remains.
An alternative is to calculate chlorine needed for all aluminium: 0.100 × 3/2 = 0.150 mol, but only 0.100 mol is present. Either method is valid if the ratio is shown. Comparing reactant masses or unadjusted mole counts can select the wrong limiting reagent.
Yield measures actual recovery
Percentage yield = actual yield/theoretical yield × 100, using the same units. If the previous reaction gives 2.58 g dry MgO, yield = 2.58/3.224 × 100 = 80.0%. Losses can arise during transfer or purification, through side reactions or incomplete conversion. A result over 100% suggests contamination, retained solvent or an incorrect calculation.
Atom economy instead measures the fraction of reactant mass incorporated into a chosen useful product, based on the balanced equation. Include coefficients; do not include catalysts or solvents that are not stoichiometric reactants. For 2NaHCO₃ → Na₂CO₃ + CO₂ + H₂O, atom economy for Na₂CO₃ = 106/(2 × 84.0) × 100 = 63.1%.
Work backwards from an actual yield
If a process must deliver 5.34 g AlCl₃ at 75.0% isolated yield, the theoretical target is 5.34/0.750 = 7.12 g. This is larger than the required actual mass, as it must be. The theoretical amount is 7.12/133.5 = 0.053333… mol, requiring the same amount of Al, or 1.44 g, when chlorine is in excess.
For the same equation, AlCl₃ is the only stoichiometric product, so atom economy is 100%. A 75% yield can coexist with 100% atom economy: the former concerns actual product recovery, while the latter concerns where atoms go in the ideal balanced equation. Actual solvent waste and purification losses remain relevant.
Compare whole processes
A reaction can have 100% atom economy and a poor practical yield. Increasing atom economy reduces stoichiometric waste, but a fair process comparison also considers energy, feedstock renewability, solvent use, toxicity, separation, recycling and whether by-products have a use. A catalyst can reduce energy demand without changing the atom economy of the same balanced equation.
Quick checks
Original Finesse questions. Reveal the indicative worked solutions after attempting each question; these are not official OCR A mark allocations.
Q1. For 2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O, identify the limiting reagent in 0.30 mol H₂ and 0.20 mol O₂.Show answer
H₂: 0.30/2 = 0.15, while O₂ gives 0.20/1 = 0.20. Water formed = 0.30 mol.
Q2. Actual product is 7.20 g from a theoretical 9.00 g. Find yield.Show answer
7.20/9.00 × 100 = 80.0%.
Q3. Find atom economy for CaO in CaCO₃ → CaO + CO₂ using masses 100, 56 and 44.Show answer
56/100 × 100 = 56%.
Q4. Why can a wet product give a yield above 100%?Show answer
Its measured mass includes water, so it is not the mass of pure product used in the theoretical calculation.
Q5. An addition reaction has one product. Does that guarantee it is sustainable?Show answer
No. Atom economy is 100%, but energy demand, solvent waste, hazards and feedstock origin still matter.
Q6. Multiple choice: for N₂ + 3H₂ → 2NH₃, 0.20 mol N₂ and 0.30 mol H₂ can form at most A 0.10; B 0.20; C 0.40; D 0.50 mol NH₃.Show answer
B. Hydrogen limits: 0.30/3 = 0.10 reaction amounts, giving 2 × 0.10 = 0.20 mol ammonia. A misses the product coefficient; C assumes all nitrogen reacts; D adds reactant amounts without stoichiometry.
Q7. Using 2Al + 3Cl₂ → 2AlCl₃, find the maximum product mass from 1.35 g Al and 7.10 g Cl₂. Use M 27.0, 71.0 and 133.5.Show answer
n(Al) = 0.0500 mol; n(Cl₂) = 0.100 mol. Available n/coefficient: 0.0250 versus 0.033333…, so Al limits. Product amount = 0.0500 mol; mass = 6.675 g, or 6.68 g to three significant figures.
Q8. A reaction has theoretical product mass 12.0 g but only 8.40 g is isolated. A repeat requires 21.0 g actual product at the same yield. What theoretical mass is needed?Show answer
Yield = 8.40/12.0 × 100 = 70.0%. Required theoretical mass = 21.0/0.700 = 30.0 g. Do not multiply 21.0 by 0.700.
Q9. Explain why recovering a useful by-product can improve a process without changing its calculated atom economy for the stated target product.Show answer
Selling or reusing the by-product reduces discarded waste and can improve economics. The atom economy for one specified target still uses that target’s stoichiometric mass in the numerator; it does not change unless the definition of desired products or the reaction changes.
Sources
Sources and examiner guidance (reviewed 5 October 2026)
- OCR A H032 specification, version 2.0 — 2.1.3(a–j); AS outcomes and additional guidance. Reviewed 3 October 2026.
- Chemrevise — OCR A 2.1.3 amount of substance — Pages 1–12; coverage reference. Explanations and questions on this page are original.
- OCR H032/01 mark scheme — June 2025 — Q3–5, Q21(d)(i), Q25(c); printed pages 8, 11, 24. Read with the question paper.
- OCR H032/01 examiner report — June 2025 — Q3–5, Q21(d)(i), Q25(c); printed pages 7–8, 21–22, 36–37. Question-specific assessment guidance.
- OCR H032/01 question paper — June 2025 — Question context for the question numbers listed with the mark scheme and examiner report.
- OCR H032/H432 data sheet — Page 2: constants used in these calculations; reviewed 3 October 2026.
- OCR H032/02 June 2024 mark scheme — Q2(b)(ii); printed pp. 13. Reviewed 5 October 2026.
- OCR H032/02 June 2024 examiner report — Q2(b)(ii); printed pp. 16. Reviewed 5 October 2026.
- OCR H032/02 June 2024 question paper — Q2(b)(ii); corresponding question context. Reviewed 5 October 2026.
Finesse Tuition is not endorsed by AQA or Chemrevise. All explanations and examples here are our own.
